The Importance of Physical Exercise Essay -- Workout Programs Exercis

The Importance of Physical ExerciseWhat is exercise? The actual definition of exercise is to use repeatedly in ordain to strengthen or develop, but to make it simpler, exercise is doing programs and solveouts to keep fit, for example, running, hiking, bicycling, and any active sport.Most Americans do little or no exercise during work or rest hours. Today there arent many jobs requiring intense physical activity. Instead of walking, people use automobiles or public transportation. Instead of being physically active, people usually watch TV in their free time. Some sports such as bowling, golf, and tennis (doubles) provide some exercise, but do non provide as much exercise as other more vigorous sports.Exercise is very important and is beneficial both physically and mentally. When you exercise, you discover better about yourself because you are fit or your getting fit and you feel that you have accomplished something that was hard to strive for. The benefits of physical activity i s it gives you more energy, it helps you in coping with stress, it improves self-image, and it increases resistance of tiredness. Exercise does not only keep you fit, it also reduces your chance of heart blow. Various studies have shown that the chance of heart attack is two times more likely to happen to an inactive person than a more active person. It really all adds up because with exercising, you burn slay calories, which keeps you at your desirable weight, which lowers your risk of he...

Paula Jones Lawsuit Against Bill Clinton :: Free Essays

Paula Jones Lawsuit Against Bill ClintonA lawsuit has been filed by Paula Jones, a clerk for the Arkansas IndustrialDevelopment Commission, for sexual harassment by then Governor Clinton. In herlawsuit, Paula Jones states that Clinton told an Arkansas State trooper toescort her to a private hotel room where she claims that she was sexuallyharassed. There are two sides to this episode Clinton states that he did not doit and that he has never seen this person before. Clintons lawyers say thatforcing the president of the join States to answer to a lawsuit will distracthim for his already hard and time-consuming job. On the other hand, Paula Jonessays that "no one is above the law," not even the President of the United States.What she wants most is for the truth to come expose and for her story to be heard."In no way is she looking for her fifteen minutes of fame," Jones says. Thecase is going before the Supreme Court to decide whether to opposite word the decisionof the two lower courts and delay the sexual harrassment lawsuit until PresidentClinton leaves office. It could be months before the verdict from the SupremeCourt will be announced. I believe that the case should be held at a later datewhen President Clinton is no longer in office. It takes away from his job whichis to run the United States of America. Fifteen years ago, the Supreme Courtblocked a damage suit against Richard Nixon with a five to four vote findingthat the president is resistant from being suied for his official acts. If thepresident gets in trouble, the whole nation is also in trouble because after allwe did elect him. Our confidence in our governmental leaders will suffer, and out

Aristotles Nicomachean Ethics: Happiness :: Nicomachean Ethics Essays

From pursuing pleasure to avoiding pain, life seems to ultimately be about achieving mirth. However, how to define and obtain happiness has and continues to be a widely debated issue. In Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle gives his view on happiness. Aristotle focuses particularly on how reason, our rational capacity, should help us recognize and pursue what will malarkey to happiness and the good life.(Cooley and Powell, 459) He refers to the soul as a part of the human body and what its role is in pursuing true happiness and range a desirable stopping point. Aristotle defines good as that which everything aims.(Aristotle, 459) Humans have an insatiable need to achieve goodness and eventual happiness. Sometimes the end that people aim for is the natural action they perform, and other times the end is something we attempt to achieve by means of that activity. Aristotle claims that there must be some end since everything cannot be means to something else.(Aristotle, 460) In this case , there would be nothing we would try to ultimately achieve and everything would be pointless. An ultimate end exists so that what we aim to achieve is attainable. Some people think that the highest end is material and obvious (when a person is sick they seek health, and a poor person searches for wealth). Most people think that the highest end is a life of pleasure. Hedonists have defined happiness as an equivalent to the totality of pleasurable or agreeable feeling.(Fox, 3) Some pleasures are good and contribute to happiness. non all ends are ultimate ends but the highest end would have to be something ultimate the only when conceivable ultimate end is happiness.Happiness is perhaps the only clear ultimate end. Happiness is what we strive for by itself and not to get anything else. So it appears that happiness is the ultimate end and completely sufficient by itself. It is the end we seek in all we do.(Aristotle, 461) Mans good is related to his purpose the purpose of a man inv olves the actions of his soul (the soul being a part of his reasoning). By carrying out the activities of his soul and doing so with proper excellence and virtue, man is able to reach a desirable end. Virtue, then deals with those feelings and actions in which it is wrong to go likewise far and wrong to fall too short but in which hitting the mean is praiseworthy and good.

Stonehenge :: history

StonehengeStonehenge is not only the most famous stone circle in Britain, but also the best-known antediluvian patriarch monument in the World, with at least a million visitors apiece year. Located on Salisbury Plain, north of Salisbury, England, it is famous for the debate, mystery, and speculation surrounding it. Stonehenge was not strengthened all in one single step, but rather in four separate stages, dating from approximately 3100BC to 1500BC. The modern visitor to Stonehenge is screening the ruins of the final phase of construction site. The monument itself consists of four concentric ranges of stones. The oldest part, called Stonehenge I, consists of little more than a circular ditch dug in the chalky footing of the Salisbury Plain, with the soil taken from the ditch piled up to make an enbankment virtually 6 ft tall. This part of the monument is about 320 ft across. Inside this king-size circle are the things that we normally think of as Stonhenge proper circles of st ones that once stood unspoilt, and the most photogenic, the large horseshoe arrangements of standing stones at the center. These last, the so-called trillithons, consist of up refine stones supporting horizontal lintels, and the largest of them weigh in around 45 tons. These massive stones have been placed in unison with these circles to create Stonehenge and along with that bring about the curiosity of why one would build such a structure as that of Stonehenge. The location of Stonehenge was not simply a coincidental happening, for the latitude is really specific in its function. In the Northern Hemisphere there is only one latitude for which, at their extreme declinations, the sun and moon azimuths are disconnected by 90, and Stonehenge happens to be only a few miles from that latitude. At the latitude of Stonehenge, this axis crosses the midwinter sunset/midsummer sunrise axis at right angles. Every year on the first twenty-four hour period of summer, the Sun rises at a point that is farther north than on any other day of the year. At the ruins of Stonehenge in England, this solstice sunrise appears on the horizon in direct alignment with the massive heel stone. This is the most outstanding feature of this ancient monument, built during the same era as the Great Pyramid of Egypt. There is little doubt that the builders of Stonehenge used it to mark this special day as the beginning of each year.

Violence Will Never Bring Victory Over Terrorism :: Argumentative Persuasive Topics

Violence Will Never Bring Victory Over Terrorism   This has been a very angry class for many of us - the year since September 11, 2001.  In a spirit of anger, hate spreads to become hostility. This  hostility must be focused on something or someone. Howard Thurman in his book The increment Edge, states, If hostility cannot express itself toward anything else, then it is like a boomerang and turns upon its possessor.  A key question that all Americans continue to face is how to respond to the death and end brought into our lives by the terrorist attacks. One might expect hate and hostility, but the prevailing response has been compassion and heroic efforts to support those who have suffered a loss.   Immediately subsequently the attacks of 9/11, President Bush identified the key issues, including the anger and grief of the American tribe. Bush said, Grief has turned to anger and our anger to resolution. We are obdurate in the goal of victory over terrorism an d the defeat of those who harbor terrorist. What does that word resolute mean? Firmness, Determination, Pursuing a fixed mathematical function, unwavering.  This fixed purpose continues to seek  target s around the world.   The glass in the side view mirror of my car cracked last week so I looked in the phone book to find a repair shop. I choose one on Lee Highway. On the right I power saw an auto glass repair shop so I pulled in to the parking lot. I had the car with the broken mirror so I asked the wench behind the counter if they could replace the glass. She looked at the car and said they did not stock that piece and could not match the tinting. I pulled out the address and find out of the original glass shop that was on down the road and asked her how far it was or if she could recommend any place that would be closer. She stated that Brainerd Glass was closer. I asked which shop she would recommend. She said, Brainerd Glass -- that other shop is run by a man fr om Saudi Arabia. I responded, there are good and bad people in Saudi Arabia just as there are good and bad people in Chattanooga.   I hope our targets are more direct than at those who are Arab, or practice Islam, or look like a terrorist and board a plane, or have ideas that seem strange.

Is ‘Lord of the Flies’ a completely pessimistic novel Essay

Goldings raw churchman of the Flies is not a totally pessimistic novel hence this is not the only reason that it was refused by so many publishers. It is discernible that although it has strong pessimism throughout the text, it is not without a brighter brass. Thus, pessimism could not be at suspension for the publishers lack of interest in the text as there are other grounds for their judgment.The Oxford English dictionary defines pessimism as1.lack of hope or trustfulness in the future.2.a belief that this world is as bad as it could be or that evil will ultimately prevail over good.So is Lord of the Flies a totally pessimistic novel? Well judging by the rendering of pessimism, this theme is indeed strongly evident throughout the text, save it is a far cry from being totally pessimistic as such. The novel explores mankinds capableness for evil as it illustrates a number of irresponsible, malicious and dotty acts performed by mere schoolboys due to the situations in which they are placed in. Maybe its only us . . . Says Simon as the radical of the beastie being only the darkness in spite of appearance one another hits him.Though more or less every character becomes a savage (as Golding describes them), some characters represent the better aspects of human nature. Ralph represents democracy and order as he is put in power by a democratic vote, attempts to please the majority and has his eyes set upon the boys salvation off the island throughout almost all the novel. Piggy represents logic and intelligence as he is thought of the thinker and is arguably the most rational boy in the group. Simon represents natural good as he is the only character to continue doing what is right whilst all the other boys fall into savagery.The novel progresses with significant losses taking place whether it is a physical loss or a conceptual loss, as Simon dies, symbolising the loss of truth, giving him a saviour-like allusion Piggy dies, symbolising the loss of int elligence, rational thought process and civilization as the conch is destroyed along with him. However, the book ends with not a totally tragicending as the boys are finally rescued contradicting the definition of pessimism as being lack of hope or confidence in the future, thus proving that this text does indeed have a silver lining.So if this novel is not totally pessimistic, what other reasons would publishers have to refuse it? Well, publishers do not necessarily choose books which they believe are good, but choose books which they believe would administer well. As Lord of the Flies was written in the early 1950s, religion and morality were much more delicate issues than they are today, thus the publishers believed that this novel would not agree with the general public.Allusions to the Bible can be found throughout the text as the themes of the original sin and falling from innocence are evident throughout. In fact, Golding initially describes the island as being a paradise, like Eden, until the boys slowly turn toward savagery and the descriptions are filled with pathetic fallacy showing the darker side of nature, such as when thunder is used to symbolise incoming conflict. The boys then begin to enter into conflict with one another, which points towards the story of the original sin in Genesis, and as religion was such a delicate issue at this time the book was deemed as unacceptable in the early 1950s.The theme of potential evil within all of mankind is consistent throughout the text as each of the boys gradually move towards a more savage, (and later on) unwarranted way of life. The idea of there being a beastie on the island is concocted by an innocent littlun (who was possibly just scared of being without an adult guardian), but this idea is then morphed into a kind of myth as each of the boys, including the biguns, begin to fear the bestie. Jack and his tribe convey a pigs head upon a stick and sacrifice it to the beastie in hopes that it will not harm them as they have attempted to pacify it.Simon then hears from the pigs head Fancy thinking the Beast was something you could track down and kill which suggests the beastie was more an idea or concept rather than a physical being. However, as Simon tries to bring the truth to the boys, he is killed much like Christ was when he aspired to bring the truth to his people. The concept of there being an evil force within all of us, and the additional religious connotations werepossibly deemed to be unpopular among the general public.Lord of the Flies is not a totally pessimistic novel therefore this cannot be the reason to it being rejected by so many publishers. The publishers rejected it due to their views on it being too scandalous and inappropriate to reveal to the public, as is shown above.BibliographyThe Oxford English dictionaryLord of the Flies William Golding

Levi Roots

How does Levi Roots use language to plow his product to the dragons? Levi Roots uses spoken language devices to persuade the dragons to invest in his product. He uses a variety of spoken language techniques such as pausing, overlapping, turn taking and accent in order to persuade the dragons. The dragons respond in a warm vogue, and join in the humour Levi creates throughout the interview this suggests that Levi root was successful in persuading the dragons. His use of language excessively sets mood and tang in different situations throughout the interview.As Levi enters the room, he start ups to sing a song. This catches the dragons attention as they commence never been welcomed in such sort before. This suggests that they are entertain and are willing to hear what Levi has to share with the dragons. There is light humour at the start of the interaction when Levi decides to joke about his avow physique, My real attain (. ) is Keith the slight pause may suggest possible re luctance, as he may see uncomfort qualified in sharing his name with other pot.However, he may also be pausing for comic effect because he knows what the response will be and how the dragons will react in return. around of the times, Levi uses pausing to create humour and comic effect, this helps him to create bond certificate with the dragons. Throughout the interview, Levi overlaps the dragons, not mainly because of disagreement but to show that he understands and respects their views and ideas as head as making polite explanations. Thank you very much (. ) no its not its my studio name Levi overlaps when Theo Paphitis asks if Levi Roots is his real name.He makes a polite explanation and tells him that his real name is Keith. However, the fact that Levi Roots is his studio name shows that he has an original name whom nearly most of the people will call him by. Moreover, the fact that only famous and professional people have studio names shows the dragons that Levi Roots may b e one of them or can be one of them in the future if he is able to convince the dragons to invest in his product. Levis varies his choices of words and phrases to persuade them. I get int see me would have this is an example of Levis Jamaican dialect his spoken language does not suit the context or the situation he is in, but he is able to control it by creating bond with the dragons, through humour. Youve just youve just lost so much credibility, this shows that Levi has achieved to create a bond with them as Duncan Bannatyne joins in the humorous tone and is mirroring Levi. Oh dear (. ) right, stated by Theo Paphitis, he has become more serious and has returned to his formal tone suggesting that he is situate to talk stock with Levi Roots.Realizing that Roots himself cant create anymore humour, he changes the way he speaks to make a more formal way and tries to do his best to convince the dragons that he is a good businessman. However he starts to overlap and pause more oftent imes than he did before at the start of the interaction, this shows that he is hesitating and is nervous as he does not want to say something he shouldnt. It also suggests that he cares in what he has to say, and wants to be seen as a confident, businessman who wants to sell his product. I think Theo must be this handsome guy right in front of me, here Levi realizes that things have become more serious, so he tries his best to stay relaxed and bring back the humour so he does not have to hesitate anymore. Levis humorous tone shows the dragons that he is being himself and is being as truthful as he can in order to be able to sell his product. By acting this way, Levi is able to get attention from the dragons, making them want to hear more on what Levi has to say, it also makes the interview more interactive as he involves comic and humour as well. Ah interchange. I like you already this shows that Levi has won one of the dragons over as he is joining in the humour. It also shows tha t Theo is eager to maintain light-hearted. Also the humorous bond between the two suggests that Levi Roots is charismatic. Moreover, the filler Ah suggests that Theo feels confident when talking to Levi, as he does not feel like he has to follow the specific tone and the business talk script. This implies that Levi is able to persuade the dragons to buy his product as he is staying light-hearted.It also implies that Levi is able to convince someone like Theo to use fillers, suggesting that they are on the same level and are equal to one another. This is because business people like the dragons rarely use fillers whilst talking and the reason why Levi Roots may be seen as charismatic is because he has successfully persuaded him to use filler. When Roots is asked to confirm the circus sales, he decides to clarify its Notting Hill Carnival, this implies that he is confident and proud ith what he has produced and done due to the events high profile and popularity. Notting Hill Carniv al is one of the most famous, and most-visited carnivals of all time, and as Levi Roots has sold Reggae sauce at the carnival shows the dragons that he had good sales and has sold the product to many people. Levi Roots is also specific with his values this implies enthusiasm and knowledge of his own product. However it also shows that he is a desirable business partner and is someone who can be trusted, which is a way Levi uses to get closer to the dragons. Two and a half thousand bottles at the carnival this connotates that Duncan is amused by how much Levi has sold at the carnival. He repeats Levi to confirm what has been said once again, and politely Levi overlaps with a yes, showing his confidence and that he is certain with the arrive of products sold. As things have become more serious, the dragons and as well as Levi take turns to talk, suggesting that they are interested in what others have to say.Levi repeats words more often and feels like he has to pause more because he knows that the dragons are focused on him and is taking his words more seriously than they used to at the start of the interaction. Yes at the moment I make it at my home in my kitchen and my children help me and an we just sort of do it as a family it comes to a lay where Duncan B. asks Levi where he makes the sauce. Making it at home suggest amateur operation so his nerves are beginning to show.Although Levi was trying to stay focused on his words and tone, he loses control as he is nervous and goes back to his informal tone of language. This shows the dragons that he is hesitating and is more nervous because he is panicked to hear what their responses will be as it is more likely to be negative. However he may also be perceived positively as he is a good family man with attractive qualities who spends time with family. Also ragae sauce may be the reason which keeps the family together, also this may leave the dragons in awe. This will secure the investment as

Ethics Game Dilemma Essay

The Ethics Game simulations of The Mysterious Rose and The Cold Feet Dilemmas address the following ethical come out of the closets The first ethical partake is regarding a party employee by the name of Gayle Dornier. Gayle has received unwanted flowers from an unknown person, multiple times per week, and to this day Gayle has no idea who is sender of the flowers. Receiving a big(p) quantity of flowers has begun to make her feel uncomfortable. Therefore Gayle is taking the proper Chain of Command to find a possible solution to the problem.After speaking to Rian browned who is the companys Ethics Officer, I decided that the most important issue was to maximize complete confidentially during my meeting with Gayle, because her issue seemed to be a actually important to her. I also had to figure out key shareholders who were at a time involved in this case, as well as whos directly affected. Decision making steps involved in addressing this issue were mainly to figure out what the issues actually are and to break it down into small separate ensuring proper investigation, as well as proper facts regarding the case were identified.The main issue is to determine if a Sexual Harassment issue is present or not. The good Lens used in addressing this issue was Rights/Responsibilities and the Results Lens. The Rights and Responsibilities Lens is based on the duties that everyone in our community has towards each other, and how we live by certain principles of integrity, for example, dole out other the way you would comparable to be treated. The Results Lens is based on the actual results that we want to accomplished, and create the greatest good for the greatest number of people. Ensuring that the companys reputation is not affected, as well as the well being of all parties involved should be the best outcome.The estimable Lens is very important in the determination of my final last I was fully aware of the individual feelings of all parties involved. The Ethi cal Lens also helped to with the proper final determination was made on fairness and facts. As Gayles Immediate Supervisor, I feel it is my responsibility all employees have useful information near processes to protect themselves in any situations of potential harassment.The Cold Feet simulation of Ethics Game Dilemma involved company researchers Phillip Waters and Nikolai Zubanov. Who both submitted reports, but deuce different results were given to me. Nevertheless Phillip Waters have suppressed information causing elimination of adverse information enclosed in the reports, the ethical issue in this case deals with integrity and submission of fraudulent information. There is a decision to make in regards to what should be done if it is declared an employee has falsified a document.The Ethical Lens used was Relationship and Reputation. The Relationship Lens is centered on processing the systems for an ethical organization. It protects the basic liberties of all people. Everyone is entitled to their rights regardless of income status everyone is merit of fair process. The Reputation Lens is focused on exhibiting the virtues which are valued in the community for people who are in roles. These ethical lenses affected my decision making it ensured that I was open and honest in all facets of the concern.The ethical perspective is not always making everyone happy, because it is virtually impossible to make everyone happy. Ethical perspective focus on making the best decision for the good of all individuals involved as well as setting the standard in future situations. These ethical lenses helped to influence my decisions based on the information that was provided. It allowed me to be fair towards all individual concerns as well as a withdraw provide me with the proper steps to handle the issue.The concepts of this simulation relates to my personal workplace. Since the conception of my new office six months ago we have went without set standards practices for emp loyees to follow. People became frustrated and overwhelm and decided to leave. Lucky, a strong Senior Management Team is currently being developed to help my office transition into new pose standards practice. I believe there should be standard practices in the workplaces by using proper ethics, and treat all individuals fairly. Treating people the same way that you would like you would like to be treated will usually ensure that the proper ethics are used in all situations.

Opeartions Humanities †War And Society Essay

May God bless our country and all who defend her, those were the get few words of scourings address to the US public about Operation Iraqi Freedom on the 19th of March 2003. It readiness sound simple, scarce whatever was said before this do a difference to the lives of the Iraqis, Americans and the world. What were scrubbings intentions? Was it that simple, or was there a deeper meaning why he attacked Iraq?Firstly, electric chair George Bush said. My fellow citizens, at this hour, American and coalition forces are in the early stages of troops operations to disarm Iraq, to free its lot . It might be an honourable belief saving the world from the powerful Iraq and helping the Iraqis. His purpose was for Iraqs Self- Interest. He needed to make sure there were no weapons powerful enough to endanger the world, he wanted to improve the well-being of the country and let the people get free from dictatorship. He wanted to defend the world. It was a noble thing to do for the wo rld, but was it only for Iraqs Self-interest? Could he live with hidden agenda?As the joined States and Iraq were involved in the 1991 Gulf War, their relationships were sour. By sending troops over to free its people might actually mean to literally invade Iraq for retaliation from the view point of some Iraqis. chairperson Bush believed that the Iraqis to be free as they were restricted by their leader here. So if prexy Bush had achieved the prolong of the people, Iraq would non look like a country at all without support. In the other light, some of the Iraqis were indeed happy under Saddam Hussein, if President Bush sent troops there to tear the country up and turn it upside down, it would non help in any way at all except ca employ chaos.President Bush also said, And you know that our forces will be coming home as soon as their twist is done. President Bush should have withdrawn his troops after invading Iraq and found Saddam Hussein. The rest of the job should be left to the sunrise(prenominal) politics of Iraq. He could have supported the new government by providing arms, money food and non US troops after the change of leader. By doing this, he would be indirectly allowing the new Iraqi government to be independent and this would help them to mature and then helping Iraq.I believed that Iraqs self-interest did not serve as argument for the invasion of Iraq. It appeared to me that instead of freeing the people, it turned out to be creating more trouble for the country and people.Secondly, Defend the world from fret danger, Bush stated. President Bush started the invasion as an act of self-protection. In the past few years, we had seen multiples terrorist attacks and the most major one being the destruction of the copulate Towers. After conformation, it was proven that the Al Qaeda (a terrorist group believed to be responsible for the bombing) was supported by Iraq, and also there were rumours that the Iraqis had Weapons of Mass Destruction in their control. President Bush wanted to find and communicate the weapons of mass destruction and terrorists. Yes, I agreed that President Bush did not have many choices to choose from. In order to reduce the chances of another attack by the terrorists, and maybe the usage of the legendary Weapons of Mass Destruction, he had to send troops to attack Iraq for self-defense.Yes, I believed that we had to eliminate the two subjects, but was it possible? After losing the Gulf War in 1991, the Iraqis were hit severely and thus might not have the necessary equipments and facilities to fig weapons of mass destruction. Also, conformations of the weapons should be clear before launching a search of it. The conformation should not be dependable on just what people thought or said. It should at least be seen. Who knows that maybe the weapon of mass destruction might be the Boeing planes that were used to destroy the twin towers, so President Bush should eliminate all the planes instead.Terr orists did not originate from Iraq, they could be found in many parts of the world, so why did President Bush want to eliminate the terrorists in Iraq only? It did not mean that by eliminating all the terrorists in Iraq would bring more peace to the world. Other terror groups might react violently and there might be more destruction. Instead, the US could have increase security and that would act as a psychological and physical hindrance against terrorists from attacking the heavily secured areas. This would this deter the terrorists away and less harm would be done to both sides. Prevention is better than cure, the US should be prepared at all times in terms of security and not give any chance to the terrorists.President Bushs argument about self-defense was effectual to a certain extend, but I believed that his methods used could be changed and a war might not be necessary. Internal security should be at a high level before considering attacking Iraq.Thirdly, And helping Iraqis achieve a united, stable and free country will require our uphold commitment, commended President Bush. President Bush wanted to end the Saddam Hussein government and help Iraq become a democratic, self-rule nation. President Bush was using the argument of moral justice. He sent the US troops there to eliminate the leader and wanted to stop extreme tyranny, oppression and sufferings by war, as nothing else might work. President Bush wanted to save the innocent and was using the interest of altruism.War might be needed here but according to the actions of the US troops, the argument did not seem to stand. As altruism emphasizes the value of defending the innocent, the US troops were not doing so. It was part of war ethics not to harm or kill prisoners of war. From sources on the internet, US troops who were stationed at Abu Ghraib ( a prison where POWs are held), treated the prisoners of war in a very unrespectable manner. And tortured to a certain extend. So, did this mean protec ting the innocent prisoners of war? I know it was quite impossible for President Bush to look at this in a micro manner, but he could have at least educated the sol blow overrs that torturing prisoners of war is a crime.Also, he wanted to help Iraq to become a democratic, self-rule nation, I believed he did not have the right to interfere and thus starting the invasion. The kind of political orientation a country believes in should not be depended by other countries. A country should have the right to rule itself and ultimately benefit its people. sledding back to the 20th century, we could clearly see how did the US tried to move on democracy and eliminate communism. US even went on to participate in wars that did not affect it as the US wanted democracy to be the worldwide ideology. The US might be fighting the war for a main reason, to promote democracy, and not free the people. President Bush did not free the people but instead tried to lock one ideology in the Iraqi minds. D oes that mean freeing the people?In addition, the war might be fought to prevent a new ideology from surfacing. Some people believed that a new ideology related to Islam might surface and thus threatening the survival of democracy which originated from United States. Islam is the most widely spread religion in the world. So it would not be difficult to influence the people into believing that there would be a new and better ideology. President Bush might be afraid of the growth of Islam and thus tried to use the argument of moral justice as a puppet.President Bushs argument looked valid at first, but after reviewing what the US troops did, we could see the soldiers did not seem to bother about the war crimes even though President Bush wanted to free the people. Also, he should let the world have their choice of ideology, democracy or something else?Finally, Millions of Americans are praying with you for the safety of your do ones .,said President Bush. From this accompaniment sent ence, we could see that the Americans are concerned over the safety of the loved ones (US troops). President Bush wanted to defend the world from grave danger, and that meant that he loved the world or else he would not have such a thought. According to the argument of individuation and expression of love, the only way to show love is to be willing to die for what you love. If President Bush loved the world, he should been in Iraq, fighting the war as he would be willing to die for the world.In addition, if you love someone, you would not want the person to be hurt. By sending so many US troops into Iraq might cause them their lives. So does President Bush love these troops? Also in his speech he said, , with our Army, Air Force, Navy, Coast Guard and Marines, so that we do not have to meet it later with armies of fire fighters and police and doctors From this, we could see that he actually wanted to prevent the civil defense to act but instead the military to do the job. This might mean that he actually loved the civil defense more as he did not want to trouble them and thus sending the not-so-loved military over to the danger zones.President Bushs argument might not be valid here. As we could see that not everyone was treated equally and this might bring harm or even death to a small group that sacrificed their lives.In conclusion, the arguments that President Bush gave in regards to the Operation Iraqi Freedom were invalid most of the time. Some of the arguments looked as if they were to cover up something else. In addition, the speech he made and the actions carried out were not the same most of the time and actions speak louder than words. Until now, we still did not know why did he attack Iraqi, but we knew he could have made other better choices instead of going for war.http//www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?040510fa_fact (article on prison)http//www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/03/print/20030319-17.html (speech)

Enrollment system Essay

Welcome The following terms serve as a contract that governs your use of our family of websites, applications and services (the Service).BY SIGNING UP, OR ACCESSING OR USING THE SERVICE, YOU SIGNIFY THAT YOU AGREE TO THESE term (AGREEMENT OR TERMS) AND TO RESOLVE ANY DISPUTE BY ARBITRATION.1. Summary of TermsThese Terms have the same force and effect as an savvy signed in writing. If you do not agree to these Terms, you may not use the Service. Each time you entry, upload, or download any content from the Service, you signify your agreement to the then-current terms. This Agreement is subject to change at any time therefore, you are responsible to review these Terms regularly to learn about any changes. We will stigmatize an updated version of these Terms if we modify them. You understand and agree that your ongoing use of the Service after we post or provide notice of the changes to this Agreement meaning that you accept and confirm that the updated Terms apply to you. The laws of the State of California govern this Agreement.You agree to resolve any dispute with us as provided in the contest Resolution Procedures described in Sections 21 and 22 below, which include arbitration and the options you have with arbitration. We use the term You to mean the person or entity who will access or use the Service as an end user. The term Login means the combination of unique username and password that is used to access our Service. A login is a evidence to use a site, application or service for a period of time that is specified. Membership or Members means a single registration and/or subscription account per user of a valid username and password (login) for the service during the term of a subscription. We or us in this Agreement shall mean its brands, affiliates, subsidiaries and operating divisions.

Pediatric Recommended Core Measures Health And Social Care Essay

After survive intoing Stage 1 for the two old ages, Fletcher Allen Partners provide call for to menstruate into meaningful customs duty variant 2 standards get drink down in 2014 ( Figure 1 ) . With this following phase, EHRs leave alone farther salvage Fletcher Allen Partners money, present clip for physicians and infirmaries, and salvage lives.The Stage 2 standards take ons new aims to better patient role upkeep through better clinical determination support, direction coordination and patient encounter ( cms.com ) . The phase 2 ends would spread turn up the physical body 1 standards and concentrate on the meaningful enjoyment of electronic wellness records ( EHRs ) to back up the purposes and precedences of the subject Quality Strategy ( NQS ) . The Phase 2 standards encourages the usage of wellness IT for uninterrupted attention and information lumber betterment.The proposed Phase 2 meaningful usage demands include strict outlooks for wellness information alter and include more demanding demands for eprescribing integrating structured laboratory consequences and the outlook that suppliers will electronically convey patient attention sum-ups with each other and with the patient to back up passages in attention. Phase 2 focal points on existent usage instances of electronic information exchange and requires that a supplier direct a sum-up of attention record for more than 50 % of passages of attention and referrals. The regulation besides requires that a supplier electronically send a sum-up of attention for more than 10 % of passages of attention and referrals. Increasingly robust outlooks for wellness information exchange in Stage 2 and Stage 3 would back up the end that information follows the patient ( Federal Register, 2012 ) . To let suppliers clip to follow 2014 certified EHR engine room and fix for Stage 2, all participants will hold a three-month reporting period in 2014.Figure 1 Phases of Meaningful uptakeBeginning NeHC Univ ersity ( 2012 )REQUIREMENTS FOR STAGE 2 IMPLEMENTATION hollow Aims and Menu AimsFletcher Allen Partners must(prenominal)(prenominal) run into certain demands for a successful Phase 2 execution. The figure of Stage 1 and Stage 2 entire aims remains the same, EPs ar must run into the the stair of 20 entire aims and CAHs must run into the step of 19 entire aims. However, the combination of aims has changed. Under Phase 2, eligible professionals ( EPs ) must run into the step or measure up for an exclusion to 17 nucleus aims and 3 of 6 wag of computer menu aims and eligible infirmaries ( EHs ) and CAHs must run into the step or measure up for an exclusion to 16 nucleus aims and 3 of 6 bill of follow aims ( Figure 2 ) . This is a alteration from EP s safekeeping to run into 15 nucleus aims and EHs holding 14 nucleus aims and 5 bill of fare aims severally. About all of the Stage 1 nucleus and bill of fare aims are retained for Stage 2.Figure 2 Changes from Phase 1 to Stage 2Phase 1Phase 2 entitled Professionals15 nucleus aims17 nucleus aims5 of 10 bill of fare aims3 of 6 bill of fare aims20 entire aims20 entire aimsEligible Hospitals & A CAHs14 nucleus aims16 nucleus aims5 of 10 bill of fare aims3 of 6 bill of fare aims19 entire aims19 entire aimsClinical Quality Measures needed to be captured by FAPIn add-on to run intoing the nucleus and bill of fare aims, eligible professionals, eligible infirmaries and CAHs are besides needed to take in clinical lumber measures.The clinical quality steps ( CQMs ) are tools used to mensurate and insure the quality of health care services by eligible professionals ( EPs ) , eligible infirmaries ( EHs ) and critical entree infirmaries ( CAHs ) within the health care system. The CQMs step many facets of patient attention to include wellness results, clinical procedures, patient safety, efficient usage of healthcare resources, attention coordination, patient battles, population and public wellness, and clinical guideline s.The measuring and coverage of the CQMs guarantee that Fletcher Allen Partners deliver efficient, patient-centered, and safe quality care.A Eligible professionals must describe on 6 entire clinical quality steps 3 required nucleus steps ( or 3 surrogate nucleus steps ) and 3 extra steps ( selected from a set of 38 clinical quality steps ) . Eligible infirmaries and CAHs must describe on all 15 of their clinical quality steps ( CQMS, cms.gov ) .Centers for Medicare & A Medicaid Services ( CMS ) selected the recommended nucleus set of CQMs for EPs establish on analysis of several factorsConditionss that contribute to the morbidity and mortality of the most Medicare and Medicaid doneesConditionss that represent national public wellness precedencesConditionss that are common to wellness disparitiesConditionss that disproportionately drive health care costs and could better with better quality measuringMeasures that would enable CMS, States, and the supplier community to mensurate qual ity of attention in new dimensions, with a stronger focal point on penurious measuringMeasures that include patient and/or health professional battleGet downing in 2014, all Medicare-eligible suppliers in their 2nd year and beyond of founding meaningful usage must electronically describe their CQM information to CMS. Medicaid suppliers will electronically describe their CQM information to their province. As Figure 3 shows, EPs must describe on 9 of the 64 approved CQMs. Selected CQMs must cover at to the lowest degree 3 of the National Quality Strategy domains Eligible Hospitals and CAHs must describe on 16 of 29 approved CQMs Selected CQMs must cover at least 3 of the National Quality Strategy domains. Get downing in 2014, all Medicare-eligible suppliers beyond their first twelvemonth of showing meaningful usage must electronically describe their CQM information to CMS informations to CMS.Figure 3 Clinical Quality Measures ( CQMs )SupplierPrior to 20142014 and Beyond*EPs carry t hrough 6 out of 44Complete 9 out of 64a?3 nucleus or 3 elevation. nucleusChoose at least 1 step in 3 NQS spheresa?3 bill of fareRecommended nucleus CQMs includeAa?9 CQMs for the grownup populationa?9 CQMs for the paediatric populationa?Prioritize NQS spheresAEligible Hospitals and CAHsComplete 15 out of 15Complete 16 out of 29a?Choose at least 1 step in 3 NQS spheresAFor 2014, CMS is non necessitating the entry of a nucleus set of CQMs. A Alternatively we identify two recommended nucleus sets of CQMs, one for grownups and one for kids. A We encourage eligible professionals to describe from the recommended nucleus set to the extent those CQMs are applicable to your range of pattern and patient population. Figure 4 shows the recommended nucleus stepsFigure 4 Recommended Core MeasuresAdult Recommended Core MeasuresPediatric Recommended Core MeasuresControling High Blood PressureAppropriate Testing for Children with PharyngitisUse of High-Risk Medications in the AgedWeight Assessment an d guidance for Nutrition and Physical Activity for Children and Adolescents safety Care and Screening A Tobacco Use A Screening and Cessation InterventionChlamydia Screening for WomenUse of Imaging Studies for Low Back PainUse of Appropriate Medications for AsthmaPreventive Care and Screening A Screening for Clinical economic crisis and carry through PlanChildhood Immunization StatusDocumentation of Current Medications in the Medical RecordAppropriate Treatment for Children with Upper Respiratory Infection ( URI )Preventive Care and Screening A Body Mass Index ( BMI ) Screening and Follow-UpAttention deficit disorder A Follow-Up Care for Children confirming Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder ( ADHD ) MedicineClosing the referral cringle reception of specialist studyPreventive Care and Screening A Screening for Clinical Depression and Follow-Up PlanAAChilds who establish dental decay or pitsPatient Care ImprovementsPatient entree to their wellness information is an of impo rt facet of patient attention and battle, and the capablenesss of CEHRT in 2014 and beyond will enable suppliers to do this information available online in a manner that does non enforce a important load on suppliers. Patient engagement battle is an of import focal point of Stage 2. There are 26 Requirements for Patient Action More than 5 % of patients must direct secure messages to their EP. More than 5 % of patients must entree their wellness information online.Loss of future gross through authorities inducementsChanges to Medicare EHR incentive ProgramsThe Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs provide incentive payments to eligible professionals, eligible infirmaries and critical entree infirmaries ( CAHs ) as they adopt, implement, upgrade or show meaningful usage of certified EHR engine room. Eligible professionals washbasin cause up to $ 44,000 through the Medicare EHR Incentive Program and up to $ 63,750 through the Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. The Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs provide fiscal inducements for the meaningful usage of certified EHR engineering to better patient attention. To have an EHR incentive payment, suppliers have to demo that they are meaningfully utilizing their EHRs by run intoing thresholds for a figure of aims. CMS has established the aims for meaningful usage that eligible professionals, eligible infirmaries, and critical entree infirmaries ( CAHs ) must run into in order to have an incentive payment. A The Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs are staged in three stairss with increasing demands for engagement. All suppliers begin take parting by run intoing the Phase 1 demands for a 90-day period in their first twelvemonth of meaningful usage and a full twelvemonth in their 2nd twelvemonth of meaningful usage. After run intoing the Phase 1 demands, suppliers will so hold to run into Stage 2 demands for two full old ages. Eligible professionals participate in the excogitation on the c alendar old ages, magic spell eligible infirmaries and CAHs take part harmonizing to the federal financial twelvemonth beginnning on October 1st. ( EHR Incentive Program, cms.gov )In order to successfully take part in the plan, EPs, EHs, and CAHs are required to subject CQMs to in order to have an incentive payment in the EHR Incentive Program.Beginning in 2014, the coverage of clinical quality steps ( CQMs ) will alter for all suppliers. EHR engineering that has been certified to the 2014 Edition criterions and enfranchisement standards will hold been tested for enhanced CQM-related capabilities.ELECTRONIC Coverage In order to let participants to successfully describe CQMs electronically for 2014, CMS is supplying a set of electronic specifications for clinical quality steps ( eCQMs ) for eligible professionals and eligible infirmaries for usage in the EHR Incentive plan for electronic coverage. A These electronic specifications contain multiple parts which allow certified EHR eng ineering systems to be plan to accurately capture, calculate, and describe clinical quality steps electronically for the 2014 CQMs. A Each eCQM can be described in 3 different ways depending on the intended usagehypertext markup language A A This is a human clear format so that the user can downstairsstand both how the elements are defined and the implicit in logic used to cipher the step.XML This is a computing machine clear format which enables the machine-controlled creative activity of questions against an EHR or other operational informations expose for quality coverage.Value Sets Value sets are the specific codifications used by developers to plan the system to accurately capture patient informations in the EHR system. A ATo have the maximal EHR inducement payment, Medicare eligible professionals must get down engagement by 2012.Eligible professionals who demonstrate meaningful usage of certified EHR engineering can have up to $ 44,000 over 5 uninterrupted old ages under the Medicare EHR Incentive ProgramIncentive payments for eligible professionals are higher under the Medicaid EHR Incentive Payments- up to $ 63,750 over 6 old ages under the Medicaid EHR inducement planGet downing in 2015, Medicare eligible professionals who do non successfully show meaningful usage will be capable to a payment accommodation. The payment decrease starts at 1 % and increases each twelvemonth that a Medicare eligible professional does non show meaningful usage, to a upper limit of 5 % .The eligibility for the EHR inducement plan is determined by the HITECH Act. The lone eligibility alterations under Phase 2 are under the Medicaid EHR incentive plan. The Phase 2 eligibility. Meaningful usage way for Medicare eligible doctors ( EPs ) Meaningful usage way for Medicare infirmaries*Payments will diminish for infirmaries that start having payments in 2014 and subsequently.The alterations from Phase 1 to Stage 2 are as followReporting Period Reduced to Three Months to let suppliers clip to follow 2014 certified EHR engineering and fix for Stage 2, all participants will hold a three-month coverage period in 2014. Phase 2 ends, consistent with other commissariats of Medicare and Medicaid jurisprudence, would spread out upon the Phase 1 standards with a focal point on guaranting that the meaningful usage of EHRs supports the purposes and precedences of the National Quality Strategy. Specifically, Stage 2 meaningful usage standards would assist the usage of wellness IT for uninterrupted quality betterment at the point of attention and the exchange of information in the most structured format possible. Our proposed Phase 2 meaningful usage demands includedstrict outlooks for wellness information exchange including more demanding demands for eprescribing integrating structured laboratory consequences and the outlook that suppliers will electronically convey patient attention sum-ups with each other and with the patient to back up passages in attention. Increasingly robust outlooks for wellness information exchange in Stage 2 and Stage 3 would back up the end that information follows the patient. Hospitals- FY14 )Providers-Jan 2014

Is good and evil can exist side by side in nature? Essay

I believe that good and malign burn down co-exist in nature. dandy and evil atomic number 18 two contrasting course, both of these words can be defined differently depending on the persons views and lifestyle although the over entirely definition of these words will be along the same lines of eat uping is evil and helping new(prenominal)s is good . I also believe that good and evil work unitedly in nature, to survive in the wild animals must prey upon one another in order to survive.Animals survive on their natural instincts that they have developed since birth to survive in the wild, in order to live one must kill something weaker to feed on. Nature is bound by the law choice of the fittest, the strongest and fastest animals eat the smaller and weaker creatures, to say it is evil for a wolf to kill a sheep is saying nature itself is evil. If a predator does not kill anything he cannot support himself or his family and will eventually perish, this is like the Nazi in the c oncentration camp at Belsen, mentioned in the poem(lines 30-50). The commandant is mercilessly cleanup spot Jews in order to support his family. In his own mind the Nazi is doing the right thing by supporting his family, but it is at the cost of extinguish thousands of innocent people which tips the scales towards the Nazi doing more evil than good.On lines 32-35 it says fumes of human roast clinging rebelliously to his hairy nostrils will stop These lines symbolise the Nazi s conscience, he is trying to forget about all the death he has ca manipulationd and momentarily thinks of himself as evil, but he then tries to repent to all the killing on lines 35-40 at the wayside street-shop and pick up a chocolate for his tender offspring waiting at home for Daddy s return by buying his child sweets and reminding himself that he has a family to support, and they(like the animals in the wild) without the support will die. The pair of vultures create a lot of satire in this poem, it conf ronts the good and evil sides of these birds.On lines 7-8 the poem says nestled close to his mate an on lines 11-13 a dump of gross feathers, inclined affectionately to hers. Both these quotes show the strong companionship of the two birds and how in love, dependant and committed they are to each other. Those lines make me think that two creatures so devoted to each other could never do something evil. The poem then turns to the other face of the birds on lines 13-17 Chinua has written Yesterday they picked the eyes of a swollen corpse in a water-logged trench and ate the things in its bowel that shows them in a darker lighting.Vultures arebirds known throughout the world for their unattractiveness and their taste for eating rotting corpses. Most people do not assume that something so foul and hideous can find love and feel compassion towards another,this is where the irony is created. A lot more irony is also on lines 23-28 Indeed how love in other ways so particular will pick a co rner in that charnel- class order it up there, perhaps even fall asleep this quote shows irony because the two vultures decide to nestle together affectionately in a house that stores human bones.The poems structure is written in free verse, suggesting the freedom that the Nazi s(lines 30-50) had in the concentration camps, it can also symbolise the freedom of the two vultures that are mentioned in thefirst half of the poem(lines1-29). The poem also reflects the poets feelings of war, they have considered both sides of the war and of each person, on one hand they are killing people and on the other hand they are following orders and protecting their country and family. The vultures show that the people fighting wars have to let go of their emotions during the war and how they are up to now the same person no matter what.To conclude, I strongly believe that good and evil can exist together in nature, good and evil balance one another out, when one animal dies another is born in it s place, when someone has suffered from a traumatic experience they can use it to help others in the same crisis, when a country is suffering due to war or natural disaster other countries unite to help re-build that country. You can always find something good from an evil occurrence.

C. Wright Mills and His Understanding of the Cold War/Wwiii

Yunlong Li November 11, 2012 C. Wright move and His Understanding of the gelid War/WW triplet Authors and historians have essay to visualize what caused and perpetuated the crisp War for decades. Although it is not a simple answer with simple component reasons, this brief essay will seek to formulate to the reader a few of the main reasons why the Cold War transpired as it did and what mechanisms kept it going. As a bureau of correspondence the Cold War, the author of the essay has re absorbed the writings of C.Wright Mill with parity to this proceeds as well as various other authors who have been cited and referenced in the below analysis. forwards delving into the subject matter and trying to understand what caused and perpetuated the Cold War, it is worth first pointing out some of the factually incorrect information that surrounds many common approaches to the Cold War. The first, and perhaps most prominent of these faulty points of view, is that the Cold War was thrus t upon the United States by a dangerous and overly competitive Soviet legal jointure after(prenominal) the conclusion of World War II.This view is faulty due to the fact that two super force-outs that emerged after the Second World War were inherently distrustful of the other. Furthermore, it can be seen that the power structure that emerged regularise both actors on a collision course with respect to the fact that the economic systems championed by both the United States and the Soviet legal jointure were inherently against one another.As much(prenominal), it can be unsounded as a self-fulfilling prophecy that both sides would enumerate into fighting with each other (Goertzel 243). In this bearing, it can be understood that it was not either necessarily the fact that the United States or the Soviet colligation was actively aggressive that ensured that the two powers would come at odds with one another rather it was their inherent differences in political systems, ideolo gy, economics, and the fact that they were both superpowers intent on dominating the ball system.Perhaps the most interesting idea that Mills put forward was the idea of what ultimately kept the peace between the United States and the Soviet Union during periods of extreme pressure and stress that pass onred during the Cold War. Mills claimed that a hierarchy of power elite were the neat actors behind the scenes that worked to ensure a full confrontation between the two superpowers would never translate into an actuality (Marino 29). These power elite, as Mills called them, were the executive branch (president of the United States), top Pentagon military leaders, and the corporate rich. Although this view definitely bears some truth, the fact of the matter is that such(prenominal) an oversimplification does not factor in to explanation the key players in the Soviet Union that also sought-after(a) to keep the departure from coming to a head to head confrontation. Mills goes on to state that one of the largest reasons that would precipitate World War III would be the fact that both sides were in such a dire state of preparedness for such a conflict.This special(prenominal) view is interesting due to the fact that many authors have listed this preparation as one of the reasons that the two sides did not actually come to blows (Warner 174). Although hindsight is of course perfect, Mills seemed to believe that the process of preparing for such a conflict would mean that the two sides would be left with a type of self-fulfilling prophecy as well as a broad range of advanced weaponry which would guarantee that the two would come to blows in the form of a Third World War.More specifically, Mills saw the advent of new weapons systems and the way in which the military industrial complex continued to push for an escalation in the conflict as create positive that the momentum for all out war was definitely evident. Many authors claim that Mills particular view of the way in which the Soviet Union and the United States would come into conflict as a result of the tensions created by the factors that have been listed was not the result of the fact that he truly believed this to be unbowed but due to the fact that he was attempting to agitate political change within the United States.Mills, although a prolific writer and well known intellectual, was also a member of the movement known as the New Left. This particular movement subscribed to the view that the military and key elements of the power elite had entirely too much power over the way in which policy decisions were being do and the common man/electorate was less and less important in determining the future of the nation.Accordingly, authors have attempted to show that rather than showing his true position on the Cold War and what might occur as a result of the political actions that were taking show up at the time, Mills instead sought to create a movement for change within the current political structure by gentle academics and intellectuals in realizing that the current course could only lead to conflict and destruction of all systems equally.Yet another substitute view states that the true allure and appeal of the Cold War was a solidifying effect for American and Soviet leaders. As they were qualified to present to their people and electorates that an existential threat existed outside of their own system, they were able to elicit levels of patriotism, belief, and economic efficiency/utility that would not have otherwise been able to be realize (Saull 1124).As a result of the fact that the leadership of both systems recognized and valued the importance that such a bi-polar view of the world effected on their populations, both sides were no doubt at least partially interested in keeping up the appearance of sudden confrontation as a means to manage their people and direct the overall efficiency of their economies. All of the guess work and alternate theori es be their place however, just because the theories of MAD and the deterrence that other strategic decisions that were made by both sides back up more level heads to prevail during this chilled conflict.Merely due to the fact that a theory is old and has been tested and mensurable thousands of times does not require that a new theory should be put in its place (Roberts 1476). Accordingly, although many of Mills points bear analysis, it would be premature and reckless to put these theories in place of the tried and true and proven theories that have for so long helped to define the logic of why the United States and Soviet Union were able to keep the peace between themselves during the turbulent years surrounding the Cold War.What is important to understand from the preceding analysis is not whether C Wright Mills or any other theorists were correct rather, understanding the different ways that these theorists and philosophers/political intellectuals saw the interplay between the se superpowers and the subsequent conflict or lack of conflict it predicted helps the researcher to both understand and appreciate the differing levels of thought that helped to nuance and develop our current understanding of the conflict surrounding the Cold War.In this way, trying to prove or disprove C Wright Mills views with relation to whether or not he was ultimately correct in the way he categorized and delimitate unique developments between these two superpowers becomes of secondary importance to attempting to understanding the causal historical factors that helped to develop the world view he works to give to the reader. Works Cited Goertzel, Ted G. The Causes Of World War III Thirty eld Later. Sociological Forum 4. 2 (1989) 241. Academic Search Complete.Web. 7 Nov. 2012. Marino, Noel. The arms trade. Detroit Greenhaven Press, 2009. Roberts, Geoffrey. The Cold War As History. transnational Affairs 87. 6 (2011) 1475-1484. Academic Search Complete. Web. 7 Nov. 2012. Saul l, Richard. Social Conflict And The Global Cold War. International Affairs 87. 5 (2011) 1123-1140. Academic Search Complete. Web. 7 Nov. 2012. Warner, Geoffrey. The Cold War In Retrospect. International Affairs 87. 1 (2011) 173-184. Academic Search Complete. Web. 7 Nov. 2012.

On Compassion Summary and Response

Kaitlyn Riesland English ci T. McCann October 2, 2012 Summary Response 2 Summary & Response Barbara Lazear On benignity In On benevolence Barbara Lazear shows three main examples on how masses in the Manhattan atomic number 18a show benignity for the homeless people in their community. After she gives the three main examples she then goes on to question whether they are actually screening compassion or if they are showing pity, care, or simply just selfishness. She also goes on to query if the people who are doing good things for the homeless people in the community are doing them just egress of fear itself.One example of this is when the lady with the stroller gives a homeless man money while he is staring at her baby, she brings up the point that she may have just given him the money so he wouldnt do anything to her or her baby. While wrapping up the end of the story she discusses how she believes that compassion is not something that someone is born with only if rather s omething that you have to learn throughout your life. What is the difference amongst empathy and compassion? (Provide examples) In todays world there are two words that are very easily confused for one another.These words are empathy and compassion, two words with similar meanings but one is more(prenominal) deep then the other. By definition empathy is one persons capacity to realize the feelings of another person. Another way to put that is you can physically check that someone else is departure through something that causes them to have emotions. An example of empathy would be if you were crying and someone realized that you were sad, that would be empathy. However Compassion is when you are feeling the emotion that another person is feeling.The other way of explaining compassion is that you are sledding through the same emotions that another person is feeling and going through. An example of compassion would be if you see that one of your friends is mourning the death of a family member and you start to feel sad and get filed with emotions because you roll in the hay what they are going though so you are sad as well. I think that empathy is mat more towards someone that you really dont crawl in that well because you may not know all of the details going on in their life. Most likely you only know the show problem or emotion being felt.Whereas compassion is something that is felt more towards people that you are adjacent with in your life because you know about the emotion or emotions that they are feeling in more depth and you are more circularize to them then you would be with a stranger. However the line betwixt empathy and compassion is a very thin line that could be crossed in the proses of being with someone. As you are with someone they might tell you more about their emotions being felt and you may open up more and feel the same emotions that they are feeling at the time.

Counselling Contract Essay

Part 11 Trainee and Setting contract2 BACP, Ethical framework of Good Practice)3 Confidentiality (Serious harm to self, harm to vulnerable adults, harm to children I whitethorn have to breach your confidentiality. Should you talk about Act of terrorism, money laundering, drug trafficking legally bound to survey to authorities)4 Supervision once a month5 Notes, locked away6 Have you been to management before?7 The way in which I work is integrative with a person have-to doe with core which means you have the tools within you to move forward and I will help still your growth in a non directive manner without offering advice.8 Time9 What brings you to rede today.Part 2 at end of first session1 summarize2 civilize safety3 How do you feel about you and I working together4 What would you a handle to gain from our work together5 Day and time/ number of sessions6 cancellation policy7 See you out and about, would you like me to acknowledge you.Hope this is of help to your Supervisee an d I can remember it and form it flow on Wednesday.Rachel focussing contractPart 11 Trainee and Setting contract2 BACP, Ethical framework of Good Practice)3 Confidentiality (Serious harm to self, harm to vulnerable adults, harm to children I whitethorn have to breach your confidentiality. Should you talk about Act of terrorism, money laundering, drug trafficking legally bound to bill to authorities)4 Supervision once a month5 Notes, locked away6 Have you been to advise before?7 The way in which I work is integrative with a person pertain core which means you have the tools within you to move forward and I will help help oneself your growth in a non directive manner without offering advice.8 Time9 What brings you to Counselling today.Part 2 at end of first session1 summarize2 cultivate safety3 How do you feel about you and I working together4 What would you like to gain from our work together5 Day and time/ number of sessions6 cancellation policy7 See you out and about, would yo u like me to acknowledge you.

Terracog Case Study

In this case, in that location are three main brushs which have been held. end-to-end these three meetings, and according to the TerraCogs meeting culture that I observed, I can bechance round problems that may generate some negative influence on the meeting dynamics and may non plow a good result easily. To begin with, I lead brief describe the mathematical process near these three meetings regarding the mold of animated. According to the timeline of events providing by the case, these three meetings are held from spring 2007 to March 2008 whose way out is concerning the mathematical product trope, food market gradeing, cost estimates, and price making.The frontmost gear meeting is held in order to speed discipline and avoid the costs of red-hot moldings and major reconfiguration (Case PP3). The product program & development aggroup decided to design based on the old products within the existing GPS technology. As the case, the convener of this meeting is Ric hard Fiero, the president of TerraCog, and the participants include Allen Roth, theatre director of design & development, and ED Pryor, Vice president of sales.The main issue for this meeting is regarding the features and quality of the new product competing with the rivals such as Posthaste and Garmin. In this meeting they successfully reached the agreement about what kind product TerraCog will design and produce, and Roth was tasked to be in charge of the designing and cost estimating. Because this is a brief and short meeting just for assigning the tasks, there is few troth and departure in the meeting. The second meeting is Aerial Pre-Launch Meeting which is convened be Emma Richardson, the new executive vice president on March 7, 2008.Because the design team completed Aerial by the end of 2007 and the product team had finished the test of the model, Richardson held this meeting with sales, outturn, and design & development to hash out the cost estimate and retail price of the new product. The specific participants are Emma Richardson, Ed Pryor, Allen Roth, Tony wasteland, the product director, Cory Wu, the manager of software and firmware design, and Alice Gorga, the manager of hardware design.However, in the meeting the disagreement occurred, Barren said that the cost of the new product production is too high because of Aerials higher-end components and conglomerate manufacture. While Pryor said he could not sell the new products in such high cost. in any case Cory Wu showed her puzzle about the high cost. Due to his problem, the meeting came to a deadlock. Reviewing this meeting, I have in mind Emma Richardson who was the convener and facilitator did less to equable and facilitate the meeting. The only thing she did was suggesting ending the meeting when the participants were at an impasse.Also in the third meeting, though she invited to a greater extent people such as Becky Timmons, the CFO, and Harold Whislter, the Vice President of design and development, to attend the Resumption meeting, Richardson did nothing alone let the quarrel carry on because I cannot see any word of Richardson in the meeting. In my opinion, there were some opportunities for facilitator to adjust the rhythm of the meeting. For example, in the Aerial Pre-Launch Meeting, when Barren finished his serious word, as the facilitator, Emma Richardson should make some word to smooth the atmosphere of the meeting, whatever it is the joke or semiformal word.In this way, the conflict or disagreement will not so easily to be occurred like the situation in the description of the case. Regarding the latter two meetings, there are several factors contributing to the dysfunctional meeting culture. The first factor is my previous statement, the malfunction of the role of the facilitator. The second factor is the seats of the Resumption of Pre-Launch Meeting. In the meeting, remote seats may aggravate the conflict among two sides. In the seats of the resumpt ion meeting, on one hand, Emma Richardson as the facilitator sat in a wrong place, instead, she should sit in the middle of both sides.In this seat, she can observe the situation of meeting more easily, and it was convenient for her the ask questions to both sides. On the opposite hand, Tony Barren and Allen Roth should sit in the same side, and Ed Pryor and Cory Wu should sit at the other side. Finally, I conjecture the appropriate facilitator of the third meeting should be Richard Fiero, the President of TerraCog. Because Emma Richard seemed to cant control the situation in the Aerial Pre-Launch Meeting, and in the resumption meeting, the facilitator and intercessor should be the people in a higher position Richard Fiero.This is what I concluded and assessed for the previous meeting held in TerraCog. However, for the succeeding(a) meeting that will be held next week, and in order to successfully facilitate, I should make more consideration about how to design and conduct the u pcoming meeting. Firstly, I will think about the purpose and deliverables of the third launching meeting. The purpose should be, as the case writes, how to push them to one. Recalling the last meeting, the disagreement concerns on the high cost and it causes a prodigious problem for merchandise.Ed Pryor require the production to cut down the cost, but the request are declined because Tony Barren, director of the production said that it was unlikely to reduce the cost because once we did that, some key features of the new products would be garbled and it would weaken the competitiveness of the new products. Therefore, I think the main purpose is how to unify the different opinions about cost cutting. If we solve the problem, the next steps regarding the pricing and go-to-market plan will be easily settled, and the project launching meeting will be finished successfully.In aspect to the participants of the upcoming meeting, I strongly cheer that the president should attend the mee ting. As I stated previously, Emma Richardson is out of capacity, further, the authority, to control the situation of the meeting because it relates the disagreement of two big departments, sales and production. Therefore, it is necessary that the president appears in the meeting. Even president Fiero should be the facilitator and mediator of the meeting. As for the other participants, I think it is nice with the same list of the last meeting.However, for the Harold Whistler, I think he did not well play his role in the last meeting. As the leader who is in charge of the design and development, he made less constructive suggestion for the problem solving. For the issues that will discuss in the next meeting, I think they mainly constitute three points. The first and the most all important(p) issue is about the cost of the new product. The production department thought the cost they estimated is very sound. However, the marketing section of TerraCog cannot make an appropriate market ing plan that would retake the losing market share in such high cost.Therefore the first issue is how to balance the cost, features and sales regarding the new product. The second issue is the re-pricing and re-positioning on the market after both sides reach an agreement on the production cost. The final issue is about the go-to-marketing of the new product and the related competition strategies. The latter two issues should be addressed easily once the first problem is solved. For the facilitation guide, I will more think about the approaches how to mediate the argument and disagreement between the departments of sales and production. One approach is one-to-one debate.Now Ed Pryor, the vice president of sales represents the voice of sales, however, there are different voice in the department of design and production. For example, Cory Wu, manager of software and firmware design also thinks the cost of producing the new product is too high. Also, Alice Gorga was absent the last mee ting, and I do not know his attitude about the problem. Therefore, I think an important step is integrating the opinions inside the party of design and production as the one voice. Particularly, Harold Whistler should play a key role in this job because he is in charge of the design and production department.First he should unify the views inside the group, and thusly I think Fiero should communicate with him to learn about the idea of the production department. That is the right step to multitude and processing the right information. Besides, at the site of the meeting, Fiero (facilitator) should hold a brainstorming to come up with the radical of disagreement. This approach guarantee everyone engage in the discussion and it is more possible to excogitate the ideas by participants. more than important, the brainstorming method will desalt the opposite atmosphere and change it to practical ways to find the solutions.

Letter to Thomas Jefferson Essay

I am writing to you, to express my discernment on the Declaration of Independence. It is something that our country is based murder of, so I feel as if I should be giving you my feedback on the matter. The Declaration is very fountainhead written and captures all the aspects of what our freedom should be, still there are a few things I must point turn out, which I will go to later. There were not a ton of let downs, but it did have a few points that stood out as odd.I plan on giving you a good amount of feedback on the subject, which should servicing you to improve the overall structure of the Declaration. The Declaration of Independence is written in an odd format. Thankfully, it has been categorized extra time which has helped us to understand each part of it. This Declaration has affected everything we do day and night passim America. A lot of what we go about doing, without the Declaration, we would not be allowed to do these things. Such as right to vote rights, same wag es between genders, etc..It drastically has changed the world, as third world countries have adopted our ways of doing things and put them in to practice over there. Everything in the Declaration of Independence all works in concert to create one things, Independence. This was the reason for it to be written in the first place and there is zilch that cannot be liked about it. When reading it, I found myself agreeing with the majority of it. There was nothing that I disagreed with or I wouldnt be living in this country.It was so well written that it is warm to disagree with, unless you were the British at the time. One of the main things that stuck out to me would have to be when you emphasized relate rights between races and genders. Overall, it is well written and straight to the point. There are a ton of really well written and thought out statements in it that bring up great points. It is what our Independence is based off of, so it is something that is hard to disagree or be disappointed with if you live in America. If you live outside(a) of America, well you shouldnt.